Sony HDR-FX1 Resolution Test
by John Beale Jan. 11 2006
This is a quick test of the resolution of the Sony FX1 HDV camera.
I recorded video at f/4, 0 dB in
HDV mode at two sharpness settings, +14 and +0, with the camera on a
tripod about 1 meter from the test chart. This put the zoom lens in the
middle of the range. I used still
frames exported from the HDV .m2t video from Vegas as a 1920x1080
bitmap into Photoshop, then directly saved as a JPEG without any
manipulation at all. For comparison, the same test chart is also
photographed with a VX2k and a Canon 20D (DSLR) using 50mm/1.4 lens at
f/8.
The test chart was hand-assembled from four
11x14 sheets of paper each with approx. 1/4 of the ISO-12233 pattern printed on a 1200 dpi laser printer. A commercially printed chart would have been cleaner.
I used manual focus for each video camera, and also compared it with
autofocus. Both methods reached the same focal point, not surprising
since the test chart is high-contrast and full of edges. The
"sharpness" setting on the FX1 defaults to +12. I normally use it
at +14 since that seems to be perceptually similar in sharpness to the
VX2k once the HDV is down-sampled to SD resolution. For
comparison I also have a VX2000 frame at 720x540 (using default
sharpness) and a Canon 20D frame at 3504x2336. I framed the VX2k
to cover the whole width of the test chart assuming the intent is to
acquire 4:3 and then crop to 16:9. You could do this comparison other
ways too.
Click on the 1:1 center crop below to see the full frame from each camera.
FX1,f/4,Sh+14 FX1,f/4,Sh+0 VX2k,f5.6
Canon 20D, 50mm/1.4 at f/8
If we define "lines of video resolution" as Line Pairs / Picture Height
at MTF50P (= resolution at which the Modulation Transfer Function
drops to 50% of its Peak value) and set the FX1 to sharp +14 and VX2k
at its default, then we get the following results (calculated by
Imatest 1.6.5)
FX1: 624 Hor. 498 Vert. (native 16:9 frame)
VX2k: 481 Hor. 317 Vert. (native 4:3 frame)
VX2k: 390 Hor. 242 Vert. (cropped to 16:9)
One could claim 500+ lines of resolution for the VX2k (as Sony has) if
you use a different measure of resolution that what I am using here,
for example "limiting resolution" where the MTF drops to zero, but this
is difficult to measure accurately due to noise and aliasing effects.
For those interested in numerical details, the charts below are from Imatest based on the full frame images above. Imatest plots comparing FX1 with sharp+14 and VX2k are shown here. The full data output including plots is available here.
Camera |
PH |
Ch |
H/V |
10-90U
/PH |
10-90C
/PH |
Over
shoot% |
Over-
sharp % |
MTF50U
LW/PH |
MTF50C
LW/PH |
MTF
Nyq |
Lens |
f-stop |
Location |
Gain |
Misc.
settings |
Gamma |
Sharp. radius |
Chr. Aber |
Sony FX1 |
1080 |
Y |
Horizontal |
1027 |
676 |
48.1 |
35.8 |
738 |
512 |
0.151 |
built-in |
4 |
15% above ctr. |
0 dB |
sharp+14 |
0.5 |
2 |
0.07 |
Sony FX1 |
1080 |
Y |
Vertical |
549 |
650 |
6.1 |
-9.4 |
492 |
545 |
0.139 |
built-in |
4 |
14% below ctr. |
0 dB |
sharp+14 |
0.5 |
2 |
0.35 |
Sony FX1 |
1080 |
Y |
Horizontal |
246 |
326 |
0.3 |
-15.1 |
247 |
286 |
0.005 |
built-in |
4 |
17% above ctr. |
0 dB |
sharp 0 |
0.5 |
5 |
0.06 |
Sony FX1 |
1080 |
Y |
Vertical |
397 |
560 |
1.2 |
-17.6 |
414 |
496 |
0.028 |
built-in |
4 |
13% below ctr. |
0 dB |
sharp 0 |
0.5 |
3 |
0.29 |
Sony VX2k |
540 |
Y |
Horizontal |
531 |
542 |
3.6 |
-1.5 |
498 |
499 |
0.488 |
built-in |
5.6 |
17% above ctr. |
0 dB |
default |
0.5 |
2 |
0.02 |
Sony VX2k |
540 |
Y |
Vertical |
426 |
355 |
19.6 |
10.4 |
334 |
310 |
0.178 |
built-in |
5.6 |
14% below ctr. |
0 dB |
default |
0.5 |
2 |
0.09 |
Camera |
Ch |
H/V |
10-90U
Pixels |
10-90C
Pixels |
Over-
shoot % |
Over-
sharp % |
MTF50U
Cy/Pxl |
MTF50C
Cy/Pxl |
MTF
Nyq |
Lens |
f-stop |
Location |
Gain |
Misc.
settings |
Gamma |
Sh. radius |
Chr Aber |
Sony FX1 |
Y |
Horizontal |
1.05 |
1.6 |
48.1 |
35.8 |
0.342 |
0.237 |
0.151 |
built-in |
4 |
15% above ctr. |
0 dB |
sharp+14 |
0.5 |
2 |
0.07 |
Sony FX1 |
Y |
Vertical |
1.97 |
1.66 |
6.1 |
-9.4 |
0.228 |
0.252 |
0.139 |
built-in |
4 |
14% below ctr. |
0 dB |
sharp+14 |
0.5 |
2 |
0.35 |
Sony FX1 |
Y |
Horizontal |
4.39 |
3.31 |
0.3 |
-15.1 |
0.114 |
0.133 |
0.005 |
built-in |
4 |
17% above ctr. |
0 dB |
sharp 0 |
0.5 |
5 |
0.06 |
Sony FX1 |
Y |
Vertical |
2.72 |
1.93 |
1.2 |
-17.6 |
0.192 |
0.23 |
0.028 |
built-in |
4 |
13% below ctr. |
0 dB |
sharp 0 |
0.5 |
3 |
0.29 |
Sony VX2k |
Y |
Horizontal |
1.02 |
1 |
3.6 |
-1.5 |
0.461 |
0.462 |
0.488 |
built-in |
5.6 |
17% above ctr. |
0 dB |
default |
0.5 |
2 |
0.02 |
Sony VX2k |
Y |
Vertical |
1.27 |
1.52 |
19.6 |
10.4 |
0.309 |
0.287 |
0.178 |
built-in |
5.6 |
14% below ctr. |
0 dB |
default |
0.5 |
2 |
0.09 |
I would not claim these results are definitive. They may perhaps be
worth no more to you than what you paid for them.
I encourage you to do your
own experiments.